It can be dangerous19/07/10

 

It can be dangerous.”Things are rather better, she says, in the private talks sessions when the media are not present. But she believes things will continue to move very slowly: ...


It can be dangerous.”Things are rather better, she says, in the private talks sessions when the media are not present. But she believes things will continue to move very slowly: “We’re two months down the road, and we haven’t even agreed the damn opening agenda – that’s a problem.”But behind the scenes, she has seen attempts to build trust, and she reports that there is some goodwill and much respect for the former United States Senator, George Mitchell, who chairs the talks.The summer marching season was, however, a bad setback “It really created a terrible situation,” she says. A lot of these guys who are calling us traitors, and making us out to be something we’re not, have minders, security people, police escorts. A lot of our women live in quite dangerous communities, and some of them have had difficulties because of this stuff. But this is something else: we’ve been called traitors because we’ve said we’re for inclusiveness.”It’s not just that it’s an adversarial style: this is very sectarian, sometimes it’s sexist, and it’s personal insults as well We’ve been humiliated publicly.

We can stick the heat – we actually want to be in it, the heat is what this is all about in terms of negotiations. She says it is members of the DUP, the smaller United Kingdom Unionists, and to a lesser extent the Ulster Unionists, who behave badly towards the women.She says: “Ian Paisley Junior says that if we can’t stick the heat we should get out of the kitchen. It has been quite devastating in the forum to witness raw, naked sectarianism.”Mrs McWilliams exempts from such criticisms nationalists and republicans – who in any event stay away from the forum – and the smaller parties who are associated with loyalist paramilitarism. It has been a rough and unchivalrous baptism for a cross-community group of women who came into electoral politics on a tide of idealism.”We’ve had to find a lot of courage to deal with it,” says Mrs McWilliams. “When you’re facing angry faces shouting insults at you, it takes an inner courage to maintain a calm and make your points over that level of acrimony”We’re representative of both communities – that confuses them, they don’t like it, and it makes us the brunt of hatred, the brunt of venom. Since her election in May Monica McWilliams, a senior lecturer in social science noted for her expertise in researching violence against women, has gained new insight into her speciality. She has had a finger jabbed into her arm by a member of the Rev Ian Paisley’s Democratic Unionists, and been pushed against a wall in a corridor by a senior member of the Ulster Unionists.

In the forum, which was set up as a vehicle for the talks, Mr Paisley has described her arguments as “red herrings – stinking, rotten red herrings.”
Her speeches are interrupted by shouts of “silly women” and “stop wasting time”. One Ulster Unionist member publicly told her to sit down and shut up. But the volcano was not extinct and when it erupted it did so with terrifying ferocity.”. successfully challenged,” he said.In a metaphor never used by a British minister in relation to Northern Ireland, Sir Patrick described it as a “volcano”. He went on: “It was as though a reassuring crust had been formed over the volcano crater. On the surface of that crust we had been executing many an elegant design and had been proposing many an exciting structure. Speaking at a conference in Oxford, Sir Patrick described the Drumcree stand-off as a black episode in the history of Northern Ireland.

“It was a week in which the rule of law was violently, deliberately and … The Rev Ian Paisley’s Democratic Unionist Party has questioned the propriety of these parties remaining at the table when their paramilitary associates have issued a death threat against the leading Portadown loyalist Billy Wright.The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, Sir Patrick Mayhew, acknowledged for the first time at the weekend the extent of the political damage caused by the bitter disputes of the loyalist marching season. There is, however, widespread apprehension that it is intent on carrying out attacks in Britain.One early point in contention at today’s talks may be the position of the fringe loyalist parties, the Progressive Unionist Party and the Ulster Democratic Party, who have associations with Protestant paramilitary groups. A source intimately concerned with the talks, said: ‘It’s going to be slow, acrimonious, trench warfare.”The talks are surrounded by uncertainty about the intentions of the IRA, which has not resumed bombing in Northern Ireland, even though its ceasefire ended in February. The purpose was to explore whether the two could carry on negotiations in parallel with the multi-party talks.Many of those involved at the talks accuse others of playing for time, in anticipation of the next election, rather making real efforts towards agreement. The general level of trust and goodwill is, by common consent, very low. One party leader said: “It’s going to be a long, long haul.”

Progress in the talks has been at a snail’s pace, with the parties yet to agree an agenda after several months of haggling.
Reports of an impending deal between David Trimble’s Ulster Unionist Party and John Hume’s SDLP as part of the talks process were described by senior sources in both parties as overblown and exaggerated.The report said the agreement could cover the thorny question of the decommissioning of paramilitary weaponry, which has dogged political negotiations for more than a year.Agreement between the two – the largest political groupings on the Unionist and nationalist sides – is regarded as essential for any overall settlement.Sources in both parties said that while a meeting had taken place between Mr Hume and Mr Trimble last week, little progress had been made.

The Northern Ireland peace talks resume today after a four-week break against a background of much gloom in political circles and with few expectations of early progress. ”But now we’re delighted to be providing such a rarity with some habitat.”. The fact that a cricket was heard calling this year means they probably have a colony there. ”It is an ugly beast and it makes you shudder at first,” said Mrs Hawkins. They kept it alive in a jar, had it identified by the borough council, then released it in their large garden.


You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.